Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 34 MICH 360 - Kohl v. Lynn

Kohl v. Lynn’s Empirical Analysis

1876

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
October 1941
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1941

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 18 state decisions

7018761880189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “-It has always been held that a .purchaser who had paid nothing could not be thus defrauded, and that no one could be protected as a Iona fide purchaser, except to the extent of his payments made before he received such notice as should have prevented him from making further payments. This doctrine has been too uniformly recognized to require discussion or citation of authorities. As Kohl had made no payments at all before the property was replevied from him, he was not a bona fide purchaser, and his rights are subject to the mortgage.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the statute which makes a mortgage of chattels, which has not been recorded, void ‘ against subsequent purchasers or mortgages in good faith,’ uses those terms in the •sense which has always been attached to them, by judicial decisions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.