Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 34 MICH 509 - Lindsley v. Lamb

Lindsley v. Lamb’s Empirical Analysis

1876

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 1934
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 1934

4 state decisions

201876188018901900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If such a deed could become operative under our statute, which requires an agent’s authority to be in writing, it could only be by estoppel.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.