Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 34 Misc. 10 - In re King

In re King’s Empirical Analysis

1901

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
October 1973
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Marshall v. . Meech · New v. . Nicoll · In the Matter of the Application of Knapp · Rooney v. . Second Avenue Railroad Company · Martin v. Hawks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A party should not run away with the fruits of a cause without satisfying the legal demands of his attorney, by whose industry, and in many instances at whose expense, those fruits are obtained.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.