Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 34 N.C. App. 367 - Ellis v. Mullen

34 N.C. App. 367 - Ellis v. Mullen’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
November 2007
most recently cited

1 district · 4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on W. R. Grace & Co. v. Strickland · 20 N.C. App. 204 - Hinson v. Jefferson · 4 N.C. App. 606 - Sexton v. Lilley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is the general rule that one who signs a contract is presumed to know its contents, and an illiterate person signing an instrument without request that it be read to him is chargeable with negligence for which the law affords no redress, unless he has been lulled into security or thrown off his guard and deceived.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.