Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 34 NCAPP 694 - Smith v. Pacific Intermountain Express Co.

Smith v. Pacific Intermountain Express Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 1978
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Kerr v. Compagnie De Ultramar · Neifeld v. Steinberg · Wyrough & Loser, Inc. v. Pelmor Laboratories, Inc. · Simms v. MASON'S STORES, INC.(NC-1) · Russell v. BEA STAPLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It seems to us that if, as here, a defendant promptly asserts his jurisdictional defense as his first step in the lawsuit, he has performed his duty in alerting the court and the other parties. His opponent can then attempt to correct the jurisdictional difficulty or assume the consequences of his failure to do so. Id. at p. 698, 239 S.E. 2d at 617 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.