Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 34 N.C. App. 700 - State v. Vehaun

34 N.C. App. 700 - State v. Vehaun’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently September 2016 · most notably State v. Elam (1981), 130 N.C. App. 692 - State v. Blackmon (1998)

34 state decisions

10019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Grayned v. City of Rockford · Grayned v. City of Rockford · Monamotor Oil Co. v. Johnson · State v. Trantham · State v. Wood

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) A person is guilty of taking indecent liberties with children if, being 16 years of age or more and at least five years older than the child in question, he either: (1) Willfully takes or attempts to take any immoral, improper, or indecent liberties with any child of either sex under the age of 16 years for the purpose of arousing or gratifying sexual desire; or (2) Willfully commits or attempts to commit any lewd or lascivious act upon or with the body or any part or member of the body of any child of either sex under the age of 16 years. (b) Taking indecent liberties with children is a felony punishable by a fine, imprisonment for not more than 10 years, or both.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The general rule is that `a person who is seeking to raise the question as to the validity of a discriminatory statute has no standing for that purpose unless he belongs to the class which is prejudiced by the statute.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the testimony of a single witness will legally suffice as evidence upon which the jury may found a verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.