Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 34 NEB 692 - Spring v. Dahlman

Spring v. Dahlman’s Empirical Analysis

1892

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
4
states following
January 1989
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently January 1989

1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

201892190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there must be an actual confinement or the present means of enforcing it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.