34 N.J. Super. 190 - Gray v. Cholodenko’s Empirical Analysis
1955
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently December 2007
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of Westfield · Case of Broderick's Will · Shammas v. Shammas · Farquhar v. New England Trust Co. · Dringer v. Receiver of the Erie Railway
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““By Ms complaint plaintiff sought redress of various sorts, including (in effect) relief from a decree of 1947, and a judgment of 1949, of the Essex County Surrogate’s Court; the first probating his grandmother’s will; and the second probating his mother’s will. Plaintiff has no case unless relief is given from at least one of these probates.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gray v. Cholodenko“where the attack is against a judgment of a court of this State and an adequate remedy can be had in that court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.