Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

34 N.Y.2d 597

Pfohl v. Wipperman

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 21, 1974

New York Court of Appeals · decided 1974-03-21

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 1979

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1974-03-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Order affirmed, with costs to defendants-respondents, in the following memorandum: Our court has jurisdiction to entertain this appeal. We conclude, however, that there are presented only questions of fact as to the weight of the evidence and no question of law. Accordingly, the order of the Appellate Division is outside our power of review. (Armstrong v. Campbell, 30 N Y 2d 704; Cameron v. Permakoff, 28 N Y 2d 938; Indiere v. Strickroth, 28 N Y 2d 513; Musumeci v. Pillsbury Mills, 11 N Y 2d 948; Gutin v. Mascali & Sons, 11 N Y 2d 97; see Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals [rev. ed.], § 148, p. 588.)

¶2Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Rabin and Stevens.

/34/ny2d/597 · .json · Public domain