Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

34 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 592

Quick v. Wixon

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1882

New York Supreme Court · decided 1882-09-15

The action was brought in a Justice’s Court in the county of Dutchess, by the plaintiff, for work, labor and services performed for and rendered to the defendant, and a judgment for fifty dollars was demanded. The defendant denied each of the allegations of the complaint; pleaded payment and set up a counter-claim for goods sold and delivered, and demanded judgment therefor for sixty dollars. The justice ordered the plaintiff and defendant to furnish a bill of particulars.

Decided 1882-09-15

Barnard, P. J.:

¶1In no case can a party to an action recover costs when he fails to recover judgment against his adversary. The general rule in actions for the recovery of money is that the plaintiff must recover a judgment for fifty dollars to be entitled to costs. In appeals from Justices’ Courts, it is provided that in certain cases offers may be made to compromise. If no offer be made by the respondent, or if made and not accepted, then the respondent is entitled to costs, unless the decision is more favorable to the appellant by the sum of ten dollars; otherwise'the appellant is entitled to costs. (Code Civ. Pro., § 3070.) This has reference only to cases where some *594judgment is recovered by the respondent. Here the respondent entirely fails to recover any judgment. The case, therefore, falls under section 3229. By this section the plaintiff is only entitled to costs when he recovers a judgment. Unless the plaintiff is entitled to costs the defendant is so entitled. The appeal was an action at issue from the filing of the return. (Code Civ. Pro., § 3071.)

¶2The order should be reversed, with costs and disbursements, and the defendant be declared entitled to the costs established for such action by section 3073 (Code).

Dykman, J., concurred.
/34/nysupct/592 · .json · Public domain