34 Ohio App. 3d 142 - Colegrove v. Handler’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
32 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently November 2024 · most notably 75 Ohio App. 3d 311 - Divine Construction Co. v. Ohio-American Water Co. (1991), State ex rel. R.W. Sidley, Inc. v. Crawford (2003)
32 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · 2 Ohio App. 3d 99 - Lockhart v. American Reserve Insurance · Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. Benjamin F. Shaw Co. · Batson Yarn & Fabrics MacHinery Goup, Inc. v. Saurer-Allma GmbH-Allgauer Maschinenbau
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[O]nce an arbitration subject to R.C. Chapter 2711 is completed, the jurisdiction of the common pleas court is limited to confirmation, vacation, modification or enforcement of the award and only on terms provided by statute, i.e., R.C. 2711.09 , 2711.10 , 2711.12 , 2711.13 and 2711.14 . Lockhart v. Am. Res. Inc. Co. (1981), 2 Ohio App.3d 99 . Thus, * * * absent a motion to modify, vacate, confirm or enforce, the court of common pleas is without jurisdiction to do anything but confirm or dismiss the complaint.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“There is no reason, absent a specific contractual provision, to restrict arbitrability to disputes that arise under the contract to situations where the demand for arbitration precedes the termination of the contract.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“R.C. 1703.29 (A) does not prevent an unlicensed corporation from defending a suit brought against it in Ohio.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.