34 Ohio App. 3d 146 - State v. Gibson’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
69 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently February 2026 · most notably 105 Ohio App. 3d 567 - State v. Caplinger (1995), 123 Ohio App. 3d 400 - State v. Higgs (1997)
69 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Ballard · State v. Stewart · 3 Ohio App. 3d 441 - State v. Rainey · 55 Ohio App. 2d 64 - State v. Wilson · In re Writ of Habeas Corpus for Mallory
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the nature of the charge and of the maximum penalty involved.”
10 later decisions quote this exact passage““A court must inform the defendant about critical constitutional rights before accepting a plea which waives those rights. State v. Ballard (1981), 66 Ohio St.2d 473 , 20 O.O.3d 397 , 423 N.E.2d 115 , paragraph one of the syllabus. However, substantial compliance with Crim.R. 11(C) will suffice to advise the defendant about other matters before accepting such pleas. State v. Stewart (1977), 51 Ohio St.2d 86, 93 , 5 O.O.3d 52, 56 , 364 N.E.2d 1163, 1167 . Thus, the court may properly determine that the defendant understands those other matters from the totality of the circumstances, without informing him about them directly. See State v. Rainey (1982), 3 Ohio App.3d 441, 442 , 3 OBR 519, 520-521, 446 N.E.2d 188, 190 ; State v. Stewart, supra.” (Emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.