Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 34 Okla. 309 - Spaulding Mfg. Co. v. Roff

Spaulding Mfg. Co. v. Roff’s Empirical Analysis

1912

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
September 1924
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Washburn v. Delaney · Vowell v. Taylor · Haas v. Lees · St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. Hurst · Lovitt v. Wellington & Western Railroad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We are fully aware of the holdings of this court' and of the Territorial Supreme Court that the filing of an appeal bond is jurisdictional. The case of Vowell v. Taylor, 8 Okla. 625, 58 Pac. 944 , is often cited, but in that case no' bond was given; there was nothing to correct or be amended. Also, in the late case of Washburn v. Delaney, 30 Okla. 789 , 120 Pac. 621 , it was held that the court properly refused an amendment or substitution; but that case carefully points out that the bond in the case was a mere nullity””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““In proceedings on appeal, when the surety in the undertaking shall be insufficient, or such undertaking may be insufficient in form or amount, it shall be lawful for the court, on motion, to order a change or renewal of such undertaking, and direct that the same be certified to the justice from whose judgment the appeal was taken, or that it be filed in said court.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““But we are not to be technical in dealing with questions arising out of the sufficiency of appeal bonds, because this court has declared, in the case of Haas v. Lees, 18 Kan. 449 , that appeals are favored, and mere technical defects or omissions are to be disregarded as far as possible, without obstructing the course of justice.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.