Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

34 Okla. 738

126 P 1024

Bilby v. Brown

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided August 20, 1912

Supreme Court of Oklahoma · decided 1912-08-20

Error from District Court, Tulsa County; L. M. Poe, Judge. Actions by the' Iowa Land & Trust Company against Beulah Brown and another and by John S. Bilby against Ada Brown and the Iowa Land & Trust Company for partition. The actions were consolidated for trial. From the judgment, Bilby brings error.

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently October 1924

3 state decisions

Relies on De Graffenreid v. Iowa Land & Trust Co. · Barnett v. Way · Hooks v. Kennard

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Decided 1912-08-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 Opinion by

AMES, C.

¶2 Alice Shields in her lifetime was an enrolled freedman citizen of the Creek Nation. Prior to her enrollment she was legally married to John Shields, a citizen of the United States and a noncitizen of the Creek Nation. She had two children by a former husband, Beulah Brown (now Beulah Brown Foster) and Ada Brown. After her enrollment she selected the land involved as her allotment, and on the 1st day of August, 1901, died, leaving her husband and these two children by a former marriage as her heirs. Both of these children were enrolled freedman Creek citizens. On April 23, 1904, a *739 deed was executed by the Principal Chief of the Creek Nation to the heirs of Alice Shields, and delivered on the 8th day of February, 1905. In March, 1907, Beulah Brown Foster and her husband conveyed by warranty deed an undivided one-half interest in the land to John R. Thomas and Grant Foreman, who subsequently conveyed this interest to John S. Bilby. The Iowa Land & Trust Company, by conveyance from John Shields, became the owner of an undivided one-third interest in the land. The court below held that the husband and two children of Alice Shields inherited the land, each taking a one-third interest. This judgment of the trial court was correct under the following decisions of this court: De Graffenreid v. Iowa Land & Trust Co., 20 Okla. 687, 95 Pac. 624; Sanders v. Sanders, 28 Okla. 59, 117 Pac. 338; Hooks v. Kennard, 28 Okla. 457, 114 Pac. 744; Barnett v. Way, 29 Okla. 780, 119 Pac. 418; Divine v. Harmon, 30 Okla. 820, 121 Pac. 219; Morley v. Fewel, 32 Okla. 452, 122 Pac. 700.

¶3 The judgment of the trial court should be affirmed.

¶4 By the Court: It is so ordered.

/34/okla/738 · .json · Public domain