34 Okla. Crim. 63 - Thomas v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1926
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 1975
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bain v. United States · 1 Okla. Crim. 469 - Wells v. Territory · 5 Okla. Crim. 546 - Gillespie v. State · 29 Okla. Crim. 266 - Ireton v. State · 31 Okla. Crim. 179 - Leyerle v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Such statement was highly prejudicial, creating in the minds of the jury the impression that counsel for defendant were not acting in good faith, and that he had argued to them the truth of a matter which he knew to be false. It tends also to prejudice them against defendant, and to add to their idea of his culpability.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Brooks v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.