Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 34 P3D 1274 - Meier v. Cloud

Meier v. Cloud’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Tobeluk Ex Rel. Tobeluk v. Lind · House v. House · McQuade v. McQuade · Horutz v. Horutz · Pearson v. Pearson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the physical, emotional, mental, religious, and social needs of the child; (2) the capability and desire of each parent to meet these needs; (3) the child's preference if the child is of sufficient age and capacity to form a preference; (4) the love and affection existing between the child and each parent; (5) the length of time the child has lived in a stable, satisfactory environment and the desirability of maintaining continuity; (6) the willingness and ability of each parent to facilitate and encourage a close and continuing relationship between the other parent and the child ... ; (7) any evidence of domestic violence, child abuse, or child neglect ... or a history of violence between the parents; (8) evidence that substance abuse by either parent or other members of the household directly affects the emotional or physical well-being of the child; (9) other factors that the court considers pertinent.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[A] court considering the child's need for continuity and stability in this context must examine not only the desirability of maintaining geographical continuity, but also the importance of maximizing relational stability.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A continuity test centered entirely on the child's geographical stability would always favor placing the child with the non-moving parent. Yet our decisions recognize that courts may properly award primary custody to the relocating parent when that parent offers superior emotional stability.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.