Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 34 P.3d 228 - State v. A.T.

State v. A.T.’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
April 2025
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently April 2025 · most notably Salt Lake Tribune Publishing Co. v. AT & T Corp. (2003), Manning v. State (2005)

2 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

120200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To make this determination under the rule of ejusdem generis, the trial court would have to determine whether A.T.'s acts were of equal magnitude or gravity as those specific acts set forth in the statute. This application of ejusdem generis applies inasmuch as we are dealing with”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “I'm not going to find that he masturbated in the presence of another. I'll leave it to the appellate courts. If they want to define”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.