Long v. Long’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
Relationships
Relies on Laudenberger v. Port Auth. of Allegheny · Eazor Express, Inc. v. The International Brotherhood Of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen And Helpers Of America · Penneys v. Pennsylvania Railroad · Sack v. Feinman · Barium Steel Corp. v. Wiley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Reference in any law or document enacted or executed heretofore or hereafter to “legal Rate of Interest” and reference in any document to an obligation to pay a sum of money “with interest” without specification of the applicable rate shall be construed to refer to the rate of interest of six percent (6%) per annum.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.