34 So. 3d 1004 - Riche v. Riche’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “a valid final judgment is conclusive between the parties, and all causes of action arising out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject of the suit are extinguished and merged into a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, or are extinguished and merged into a judgment in favor of |4the defendant as to preclude subsequent action.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 162 So. 3d 1270 - State v. Jim · 81 So. 3d 57 - Hulshoff v. Hulshoff

2. “In an action for divorce under Civil Code Article 102 or 103, in an action for determination of incidental matters under Civil Code Article 105, in an action for contributions to a spouse’s education or training under Civil Code Article 121, and in an action for partition of community property and settlement of claims between spouses under R.S. 9:2801, the judgment has the effect of res judicata only as to causes of action actually adjudicated.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 113 So. 3d 274 - Olsen v. Olsen

3. “(1) The judgment is valid; (2) The judgment is final; (3) The parties are the same, and appearing in the same capacities; (4) The cause of action asserted in the second suit existed at the time of the judgment; and, (5) The cause of action asserted in the second suit arose from the same transaction or occurrence that was the subject of the first litigation.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 162 So. 3d 1270 - State v. Jim