¶1(concurring in the result).
¶2I concur in the result. See Ex parte Sawyer, 984 So.2d 1100 (Ala.2007) (Murdock, J., concurring in the result).
34 So. 3d 1248
Vines v. Benefield
Decided September 30, 2009
Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 2009-09-30
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 2018
7 state decisions
Relies on Ex Parte Sawyer
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2009-09-30
View the full empirical analysis of this case →