Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 34 So. 3d 548 - McClellan v. State

34 So. 3d 548 - McClellan v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Blockburger v. United States · 895 So. 2d 836 - Bush v. State · Morey v. Commonwealth · 249 So. 2d 414 - Curry v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there must be sufficient facts to warrant a finding that [the] defendant was aware of the presence and character of the particular substance and was intentionally and consciously in possession of it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.