Renfrow v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 895 So. 2d 836 - Bush v. State · 772 So. 2d 1010 - Adams v. State · Foley v. State · 236 So. 2d 408 - Wright v. State · Roberson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[b]y including that language, the State imposed a mens rea requirement, and it was obligated to prove that aspect of the charge beyond a reasonable doubt.” Id. The record reflects that Watts's indictment charges him with”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The task of the issuing magistrate is simply to make a practical, common-sense decision based on all the circumstances set forth in the affidavit before him, including the veracity and basis of knowledge of persons supplying hearsay information.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.