Hendricks v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
19
cited by 19 later decisions
3
states following
August 2020
most recently cited
19 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Delva · 53 Cal. 3d 1289 - People v. McAlpin · 837 So. 2d 366 - Reed v. State · 762 So. 2d 879 - Brooks v. State · Larzelere v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he court was concerned with the reliability of such reputations given that sexual conduct of the nature alleged here normally does not occur in public. Implicit in the court's analysis is the conclusion that reputations for truthfulness, peacefulness, etc. are more reliable and less likely to differ from reality because those traits are commonly displayed in public.... In addition, it is highly unlikely that a person will discuss his or her immoral or indecent sexual conduct; therefore, a person's reputation for sexual conduct is not likely to reflect immoral or indecent conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Despite Appellant's failure to argue fundamental error, we consider whether the purported error is of a fundamental nature because it is an appellate court's 'unrenunciable judicial duty' to correct fundamental error even if it is not raised.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“it is our duty to notice and correct ... fundamental errors even when they have not been identified by the parties”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.