Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

34 S.W.2d 598

Wright v. State

Decided December 3, 1930

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 1983

1 state decisions

Relies on 92 Tex. Crim. 103 - Crowley v. State · 97 Tex. Crim. 312 - Bailey v. State · 99 Tex. Crim. 143 - Gandy v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1930-12-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1The unlawful transportation of intoxicating liquor is the offense; penalty, confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

¶2The record is here without statement of facts and bills of exception. No fault is perceived in the procedure.

¶3The judgment is affirmed.

¶4Affirmed.

¶5HAWKINS, J., absent.

¶6

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

¶7Appellant's motion for rehearing is apparently predicated upon the assumption that an indictment charging the transportation of intoxicating liquor is not good unless it is averred that such transportation is for the purpose of sale. This is not the law. See Crowley v. State, 92 Tex.Crim. R.,242 S.W. 472; Harrison v. State, 95 Tex.Crim. R.,254 S.W. 975; Turner v. State, 95 Tex.Crim. R., 255 S.W. 439; Harper v. State, 257 S.W. 1102; Bailey v. State, 97 Tex.Crim. R.,260 S.W. 1057; Gandy v. State, 99 Tex.Crim. R.,268 S.W. 951; Brown v. State, 101 Tex.Crim. R., 276 S.W. 438.

¶8The motion for rehearing is overruled.

¶9Overruled.*357

/34/sw2d/598 · .json · Public domain