Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

34 S.W.3d 209

Wolfram v. Wolfram

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 28, 2000

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2000-11-28

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 2016

7 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-11-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Peggy Wolfram (‘Wife”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment and decree dissolving her marriage to Ralph Wolfram (“Husband”). Wife argues that the trial court erred in (1) awarding insufficient maintenance; (2) classifying certain stocks and other assets as Husband’s separate property; (3) allocating marital debt solely to Wife; and (4) ordering Wife to pay a percentage of attorney fees and costs. We affirm.1

¶3We have reviewed the parties’ briefs, the legal file, and exhibits. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

¶4We affirm the judgment.

¶5. Husband’s motion to dismiss has been considered and denied.

/34/sw3d/209 · .json · Public domain