State v. Land’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
27
cited by 27 later decisions
5
states following
January 2019
most recently cited
26 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Edwards v. Arizona · Ohio v. Roberts · Rhode Island v. Innis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Wjhere a defendant has injected an issue into the case, the State may be allowed to admit otherwise inadmissable evidence in order to explain or counteract a negative inference raised by the issue defendant injects.” (internal quotations and citation omitted)). 12 . The State also pointed out that, in addition to testifying, Mr. McKinley also called witnesses to testify about his good character in general and his reputation for truthfulness. Once a defendant puts on evidence of his character,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.