Charles Dehault Delassus v. The United States’s Empirical Analysis
34 U.S. 117 · 1835
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 district · 16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 53 later decisions (12 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 1987 · most notably Pan American Petroleum & Transport Co. v. United States (1927), Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Arenz (1933)
5 federal appellate · 2 district · 16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on The United States v. Don Fernando De La Maza Arredondo · United States v. Juan Percheman · United States v. Clarke
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““* * * The United States seems never to have claimed any part of what could be shown by legal evidence and local law to have been severed from the royal domain before their right attached, whether the severance was by patent, concession, warrant, order of survey, or any other act which might have been perfected into a complete title, by the laws, Usages, and customs of Spain. * * * ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““A grant or concession made by that officer, who is by law authorized to make it, ■ carries with it vrima facie evidence that it is within his power. No excess pf them, or departure from them, is to be presumed. He violates his duty by'such' excess, and is responsible for it. He who alleges that an officer entrusted with an important duty has violated his instructions must show it.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. United States v. Coe““No principle is better settled in this country than that an inchoate title to lands is property.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Crochet v. McCamant
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.