34 Va. App. 109 - Shelton v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2003
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · McMann v. Richardson · Oregon v. Elstad · California v. Beheler · New York v. Quarles
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The police ... were confronted with the immediate necessity of ascertaining the whereabouts of a gun which they had every reason to believe the suspect had just removed from his empty holster and discarded ... [s]o long as the gun was concealed somewhere ... with its actual whereabouts unknown, it obviously posed ... danger to the public safety____We decline to place officers ... in the untenable position of having to consider, often in a matter of seconds, whether it best serves society for them to ask the necessary questions without the Miranda warnings and render whatever probative evidence they uncover inadmissible, or for them to give the warnings in order to preserve the admissibility of evidence they might uncover but possibly damage or destroy their ability to obtain that evidence and neutralize the volatile situation confronting them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.