34 Wash. 2d 183 - State v. Salle’s Empirical Analysis
1949
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently July 2009
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kirby v. United States · Metropolitan Ry Co v. Church Brightwood Ry Co · Wertheimer & Goldberg v. State · State v. Linden · 124 Cal. App. 402 - People v. Morris
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In the record appears a transcript of the locution recorded upon the disc which was played before the jury by means of a phonographic device. This transcript is written in perfectly intelligible form and we have no means of knowing what,' if any, part of the recording was indistinct. But, in any event, the mere fact that some portion of it may have been inaudible would not render the entire recording inadmissible. • “In United States v. Schanerman, 3 Cir., 150 F.2d 941, 944 , which was' a bribery prosecution, it was held that the mere fact that certain portions of mechanically recorded conversations were less audible than others did not call'for exclusion of what the jurors personally heard from the ‘playing’ of the records. In the words of the court, “ ‘There would be no more valid reason for exclusion of the mechanically recorded conversations than there would be for excluding competent conversations, overheard in part, by human witnesses.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[The] rule, [that evidence of a collateral crime is inadmissible] has its well-defined and well-recognized exceptions, as where the element of motive, intent, identity, guilty knowledge, or a systematic scheme or plan is involved. In such instances, evidence of similar transactions may, in proper cases, be received to establish a constituent element of the crime charged, even though it may at the same time tend to prove the commission of other criminal offenses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“until found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Devin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.