34 Wash. App. 324 - Simonson v. Fendell’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 87 Wash. 2d 796 - Hsu Ying Li v. Tang · 83 Wash. 2d 764 - Curtis Lumber Co. v. Sortor · 31 Wash. App. 86 - Topline Equipment, Inc. v. Stan Witty Land, Inc. · 16 Wash. App. 466 - Vermette v. Andersen · 33 Wash. App. 766 - Lindsay Credit Corp. v. Skarperud
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) Generally. If applicable law grants to a party the right to recover reasonable attorney's fees or expenses on review, the party should request the fees or expenses as provided in this rule. (b) Argument in Brief. The party should devote a section of the brief to the request for the fee or expenses. The request should not be made in the cost bill. (c) Affidavit. Seven days prior to oral argument, the party should serve and file an affidavit in the appellate court detailing the expenses incurred and the services performed by counsel. (d) Oral Argument. A party should include in oral argument a request for the fee or expenses and a reference to the affidavit on file.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he primary consequence of denying attorney's fees because an attorney did not fully comply with RAP 18.1 is to place the monetary loss upon the client, not the attorney. If attorney's fees are denied because his attorney failed to fully comply with RAP 18.1, it is the client who must pay his attorney instead of the fees being rightfully paid by the opposing party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“These rules will be liberally interpreted to promote justice and facilitate the decision of cases on the merits. Cases and issues will not be determined on the basis of compliance or noncompliance with these rules except in compelling circumstances where justice demands, subject to the restrictions in rule 18.8(b).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.