34 Wash. App. 687 - Solomonson v. Melling’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 81 Wash. 2d 448 - Siegler v. Kuhlman · 27 Wash. 2d 802 - Gardner v. Seymour · 36 Wash. 2d 256 - Cook v. Seidenverg · 81 Wash. 2d 251 - Kness v. Truck Trailer Equipment Co. · Miller v. Lucas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The court may adopt as the standard of conduct of a reasonable man the requirements of a legislative enactment or an administrative regulation whose purpose is found to be exclusively or in part (a) to protect a class of persons which includes the one whose interest is invaded, and (b) to protect the particular interest which is invaded, and (c) to protect that interest against the kind of harm which has resulted, and (d) to protect that interest against the particular hazard from which the harm results.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.