Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 340 A2D 821 - Owens v. United States

Owens v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 1991
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 1991

4 state decisions

20197519801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 10 U.S.C. § 831

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Harris v. New York · Michigan v. Tucker · Oregon v. Hass · Allen v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Common sense tells us otherwise. Interrogation forbidden by Miranda is not a single question at the threshold of the encounter . . .. [Owens v. United States, D.C.App., 340 A.2d 821, 824 (1975).]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.