Olive v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[Tjhis court has consistently viewed the right to counsel provided by Article 2, section 10, as guaranteeing the same right conferred by the Sixth Amendment. See, e.g., Beyer v. State, 331 Ark. 197 , 962 S.W.2d 751 (1998); Jones v. State, 314 Ark. 383 , 862 S.W.2d 273 (1993), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1237 , 114 S.Ct. 2743 , 129 L.Ed.2d 863 (1994); Clements v. State, 306 Ark. 596 , 817 S.W.2d 194 (1991). Likewise, this court has observed that Article 2, section 8, is "our state constitutional equivalent” to the Fifth Amendment. Clark v. State, 256 Ark. 658, 659 , 509 S.W.2d 812, 814 (1974). Additionally, this court has frequently relied on the Supreme Court's decisions in determining the scope of the right to counsel during custodial interrogation. See, e.g., Riggs v. State, 339 Ark. 111 , 3 S.W.3d 305 (1999); Esmeyer v. State, 325 Ark. 491 , 930 S.W.2d 302 (1996); Bowen v. State, 322 Ark. 483 , 911 S.W.2d 555 (1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1226 , 116 S.Ct. 1861 , 134 L.Ed.2d 960 (1996).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Osburn v. State