Hicks v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
50 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably Chunestudy v. State (2012), Miles v. State (2002)
50 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on MacKintrush v. State · Green v. State · Sullinger v. State · Rychtarik v. State · Heffernan v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the standard of review for imposing sanctions for discovery violations is whether there has been an abuse of discretion. A prosecutorial discovery violation does not automatically result in reversal. The key in determining if a reversible discovery violation exists is whether the appellant was prejudiced by the prosecutor's failure to disclose. Absent a showing of prejudice, we will not reverse.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Duck v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.