Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 340 F.2d 301 - Smoot v. Fox

Smoot v. Fox’s Empirical Analysis

340 F.2d 301 · 1964

Citation profile

78
cited by 78 later decisions
7
states following
August 2023
most recently cited

25 federal appellate · 6 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 78 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably Kaspar Wire Works, Inc. v. Leco Engineering & Machine, Inc. (1978), 59 Ohio St. 2d 29 - State ex rel. Potain v. Mathews (1979)

25 federal appellate · 6 district · 8 state decisions

1801964197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on New York Times Co. v. Sullivan · Roche v. Evaporated Milk Ass'n · Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. Holland · Cardillo v. United States · Ex parte Fahey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[d]ismissal of an action with prejudice is a complete adjudication of the issues presented by the pleadings and is a bar to a further action between the parties,”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We know of no power in a trial judge to require a lawyer to submit evidence on behalf of a plaintiff, when he considers he has no cause of action or for any reason wishes to dismiss his action with prejudice, the client being agreeable. A plaintiff should have the same right to refuse to offer evidence in support of his claim that a defendant has.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “No case has been cited to us, nor have we found any, where a plaintiff, upon his own motion, was denied the right to dismiss his case with prejudice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.