Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

340 F.2d 319

Docket No. 22134.

Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. United States

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1965-01-26

2 counsel of record

Relies on 221 F. Supp. 191 - Mohasco Industries, Inc. v. E. T. Barwick Mills, Inc.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1965-01-26

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 1994

6 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

501965197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

William B. Devaney, Washington, D.C., Allan Milledge, neal Rutledge, Miami, Fla., J. Turner Butler, Jacksonville, Fla., for appellant.

William J. Hamilton, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Jacksonville, Fla., Sherman L. Cohn, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Before BROWN, GEWIN and BELL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

The Motion of Appellant, Florida East Coast Railway Company, for stay pending appeal from the Orders of October 30 and December 3, 1964, having been heard and considered upon oral argument and briefs on December 8, 1964, is hereby denied.

/340/f2d/319 · .json · Public domain