Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 340 F.2d 352 - Everett v. United States

Everett v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

340 F.2d 352 · 1965

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
May 2007
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently May 2007 · most notably Piccone v. United States (1969), Ainsworth v. United States (1968)

2 federal appellate ·

18019651970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boire v. Greyhound Corp. · Weyerhaeuser Steamship Co. v. United States · United States v. Wickersham · Dahn v. Davis · 78 F. Supp. 126 - Gadsden v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[B]ack pay for improper dismissal should be denied where the employee was not ready, willing and able to resume his position during the period for which relief was sought. The purpose of that prerequisite ... is to insure that federal employees who are improperly dismissed will recover no more than the amount actually lost as a result of the separation. * * * If the employee was incapable of performing the work for which the pay was to be received, it follows that he has lost nothing which he would have earned but for the wrongful separation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Any person removed or suspended * * * who * * * is reinstated or restored to duty on the ground that such removal or suspension was unjustified or unwarranted, shall be paid compensation at the rate received on the date of such removal or suspension”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.