Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 340 F.2d 503 - Jacob W. Henock and Kate K. Henock, His Wife v. Willis H. Yeamans

Jacob W. Henock and Kate K. Henock, His Wife v. Willis H. Yeamans’s Empirical Analysis

340 F.2d 503 · 1965

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
July 1998
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Capital Transit Co. v. Public Utilities Commission of the District of Columbia · 68 So. 2d 604 - Beverly Beach Properties v. Nelson · Jenkins v. the City Ice and Fuel Co. · Stewart v. Eaton · Peoples Savings Bank v. Geistert

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It seems to be the law of Michigan that one who appears specially for the purpose of objecting to the court's jurisdiction is precluded, after an adverse ruling, from collaterally attacking a judgment on the ground that the court had no jurisdiction over the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.