Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 340 F.2d 547 - United States v. Klein

United States v. Klein’s Empirical Analysis

340 F.2d 547 · 1965

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
1
states following
April 2003
most recently cited

31 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently April 2003 · most notably United States v. S. Lawrence Kahn, Arthur B. Sachs and M. Prial Curran (1967), United States v. Papadakis (1975)

31 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

19019651970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stirone v. United States · Michelson v. United States · United States v. Stirone · Kowalchuk v. United States · United States v. Robbins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where, as here the evidence is susceptible of the interpretation that the acts alleged to constitute the crime were innocently performed and the vital issues of knowledge and intent are keenly disputed, it is well within the trial judge’s discretion to permit the Government, on a properly limited basis, to introduce evidence of prior similar offenses demonstrating the unlikelihood that the defendant was a mere innocent, unknowing bystander. For in such eases the jury must be relied upon not to convict the defendant solely because he is an evil fellow with a propensity towards criminal behavior in general * * * but because of the sheer improbability that a person with his familiarity and experience with the specific criminal conduct charged might have been unaware that a crime was being committed or might have performed the acts with an innocent and lawful intent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.