Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 340 F.2d 645 - Hoffman v. United States

Hoffman v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

340 F.2d 645 · 1964

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently March 2014 · most notably Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc., a Corporation v. The United States (1965), Paccon, Inc. v. United States (1968)

4 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

210196419701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co. · Pennsylvania v. Budd Co. · Williams v. United States · Williams v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Authority may undertake or award other contracts for additional work, and the Contractor shall fully cooperate with such other contractors and Authority employees and carefully fit his own work to such additional work as may be directed by the Contracting Officer. The Contractor shall not commit or permit any act which will interfere with the performance of work by any other contractor or by Authority employees.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “These rights inured through the right of the Government to require cooperation from this subcontractor through the Government contract with the prime contractor, the State of Oregon. There is no evidence that defendant ever attempted to secure this cooperation, other than arranging for one unsuccessful conference with Young & Smith who refused to make any changes 'because nobody offered to pay for it.' 19”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “all responsibility on the part of the Government to direct or require cooperation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.