Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 340 F.2d 684 - United States v. Robbins

United States v. Robbins’s Empirical Analysis

340 F.2d 684 · 1965

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
3
states following
October 1998
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently October 1998 · most notably United States v. Kelly (1965), United States v. Deaton (1967)

33 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

2701965197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Berger v. United States · Michelson v. United States · Cardillo v. United States · Southern Railway Co. v. Jackson · United States v. Kahaner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The rule which permits the introduction of evidence respecting similar offenses for this limited purpose is based on the sound recognition that when there exists a pattern of misrepresentations, closely related in time and subject matter, it is reasonable to believe that they were not made innocently. As Wig-more so succinctly wrote, ‘The argument here is purely from the point of view of the doctrine of chances, — the instinctive recognition of that logical process which eliminates the element of innocent intent by multiplying instances of the same result until it is perceived that this element cannot explain them all.’ 2 Wigmore, Evidence § 302.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.