Interstate Commerce Commission v. AAA Con Drivers Exchange, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
340 F.2d 820 · 1965
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc. · Gray v. Powell · Bullen v. State of Wisconsin · Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co. · Alton Co v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ . . . the question is not whether [one] operation is different from [another], but whether it is so different as to require the Commission to treat it differently. ‘We deal in totalities; indicia are instruments of decision, not touchstones,’ United States v. Drum, supra, 368 U.S. at 384 , 82 S.Ct. at 415 .” ICC v. AAA Con Drivers Exchange, Inc., supra, at 826.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.