Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 340 F.2d 827 - Weed v. United States

Weed v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

340 F.2d 827 · 1965

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
8
states following
February 1996
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 4 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently February 1996 · most notably United States v. Colbert (1973), William C. Drummond v. United States of America, Alphonse Vincent Castaldi v. United States (1965)

28 federal appellate · 4 district · 12 state decisions

2401965197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2312

Relies on Massiah v. United States · Huggins v. Raines · American Tobacco Co. v. Green · Peterbilt-Southern Sales, Inc. v. Pacific Car & Foundry Co. · Villano v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[E]very reasonable presumption is against an accused’s waiver of his constitutional rights, particularly when he is in custody, and the consent must be ‘specific,’ ‘unequivocal,’ and ‘freely and intelligently given.’ * * * Particular words of consent must always be weighed in light of the atmosphere and totality of circumstances in which they are spoken in order to determine the intent and voluntariness of the words.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “always be weighed in light of the atmosphere and totality of circumstances in which they are spoken in order to determine the intent and voluntariness of the words.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.