United States v. Mingo’s Empirical Analysis
340 F.3d 112 · 2003
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 2020
5 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1344 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 982 (§ 1366 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 28 U.S.C. § 46
Relies on Stinson v. United States · United States v. Monus · United States v. Lewis · United States v. Millar · United States of America v. Skw Metals & Alloys Inc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the language of the Guidelines provision is plain, the plain language controls.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“As with statutory language, the plain and unambiguous language of the Sentencing Guidelines affords the best recourse for their proper interpretation....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the wording of the Guideline is subject to but one interpretation, it is unnecessary to consult other sources for interpretive guidance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.