Electronics for Imaging, Inc. v. Coyle’s Empirical Analysis
340 F.3d 1344 · 2003
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 31 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 104 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably Avocent Huntsville Corp. v. Aten International Co. (2009), Breckenridge Pharmaceutical, Inc. v. Metabolite Laboratories, Inc. (2006)
21 federal appellate · 31 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Burger King Corporation v. Rudzewicz · Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. Hall · Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty. · Milliken v. Meyer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 104 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the burden on the defendant, (2) the interests of the forum state, (3) the plaintiffs interest in obtaining relief, (4) the interstate judicial system’s interest in obtaining the most efficient resolution of controversies, and (5) the shared interest of the several states in furthering fundamental substantive social policies.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A] district court must accept the uncontroverted allegations in the plaintiffs complaint as true .... ” (emphasis added)). 17 . It is worth noting that Lee also avers that”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The contacts made by defendants must therefore by their actions create a substantial connection to the forum state— where defendants have deliberately engaged in significant activities within a State or have created continuing obligations between themselves and residents of the forum — and proximately result from the actions by the defendants themselves, such that it is presumptively not unreasonable to require defendants to submit to the burdens of litigation in that forum as well.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.