Intervest, Inc. v. Bloomberg, L.P.’s Empirical Analysis
340 F.3d 144 · 2003
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc. · Monsanto Company v. Spray-Rite Service Corporation · Business Electronics Corp. v. Sharp Electronics Corp. · Big Apple BMW, Inc. v. BMW of North America, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]ntitrust law limits the range of permissible inferences from ambiguous evidence in a § 1 case.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“consciously parallel behavior, a plaintiff must show (1) that the defendants' behavior was parallel; (2) that the defendants were conscious of each other's conduct and that this awareness was an element in their decision-making process; and (3) certain `plus' factors.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“should not tightly compartmentalize the evidence put forward by the nonmovant, but instead should analyze it as a whole to see if it supports an inference of concerted action.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.