Roman v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
340 F.3d 314 · 2003
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2024 · most notably Rumsfeld Secretary of Defense v. Padilla et al. (2004), Garcia-Echaverria v. United States (2004)
11 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1546 · 18 U.S.C. § 4001 · 28 U.S.C. § 1406 · 28 U.S.C. § 1631 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2243 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 408 (§ 208 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Enrico St Cyr · Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of Kentucky · Goldlawr, Inc. v. Heiman · Felker v. Turpin · Ahrens v. Clark
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As a general rule, a petitioner should name as a respondent to his habeas corpus petition 'the individual having day-to-day control over the facility in which [the alien] is being detained.' ” Roman v. Ashcroft, 340 F.3d 314, 319 (6th Cir.2003) (quoting Vasquez v. Reno, 233 F.3d 688, 696 (1st Cir.2000)).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he language of § 1631 does not refer to any specific type of jurisdiction, only referring broadly to jurisdiction”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“act pursuant to INS Detention Standards and are considered agents of the INS District Director in their district.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.