In Re: G.A.D., Incorporated, Debtor. Donna Eglinton v. Hugh Loyer and George Chapel’s Empirical Analysis
340 F.3d 331 · 2003
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably Days Inns Worldwide, Inc. v. Patel (2006), Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. v. Islamic Republic of Iran (2013)
11 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 365
Relies on Haines v. Kerner · McNeil v. United States · ITT Gilfillan v. Clayton · Nemaizer v. Baker · Michigan Employment Security Commission v. Wolverine Radio Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Motions under [Civil Rule 60(b)] subsections (4), (5) and (6) may be made within a “reasonable time,” which we have determined is dependent upon the facts in a case, including length and circumstances of delay in filing, prejudice to opposing party by reason of the delay, and circumstances warranting equitable relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Other circuits have determined ... that a Rule 60(b)(4) motion will succeed only if the lack of subject matter jurisdiction was so glaring as to constitute a total want of jurisdiction, or no arguable basis for jurisdiction existed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wendt v. Leonard“Under Rule 60(b)(4), if the rendering court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, the underlying judgment is void, and it is per se an abuse of discretion to deny a movant’s motion to vacate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.