Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 340 F.3d 724 - United States v. Wright

United States v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis

340 F.3d 724 · 2003

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
June 2023
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently June 2023

14 federal appellate · 2 district ·

180200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1201 (International Parental Kidnapping Crime Act of 1993) · 18 U.S.C. § 924

Relies on United States v. Olano · Lockhart v. McCree · White v. Illinois · United States v. McCarthy · United States v. Erdman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n classifying burglary of a dwelling as a crime of violence, the Guidelines do not distinguish between dwellings that are occupied versus those that are unoccupied; thus, burglary of a dwelling is a crime of violence regardless of whether there was anyone present in the dwelling during the burglary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “whether the prospective juror can lay aside his impression or opinion and render a verdict based on the evidence presented in court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the jurors can conscientiously and properly carry out their sworn duty to apply the law to the facts of the particular case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.