Jaramillo v. Stewart’s Empirical Analysis
340 F.3d 877 · 2003
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently September 2022
8 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · Schlup v. Delo · Bousley v. United States · Herrera v. Collins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“evidence if credible, and considered in light of all the evidence, demonstrate[d] that it [was] more likely than not that no reasonable juror would have convicted [the petitioner] of the charged offenses”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Absent a showing of a lack of due diligence, a petitioner will be excused from showing compliance with the balance of [§ 2254(e)(2)'s] requirements.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Davis v. Woodford
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.